President Obama’s latest budget endorses a “Buffett rule” — a new floor on taxes paid by folks with very high incomes. His rule would require that “those making over $1 million should pay no less than 30 percent of their income in taxes.”
The president didn’t offer many specifics about how the rule would actually work. Up on Capitol Hill, however, Senator Sheldon Whitehouse and Representative Tammy Baldwin have introduced legislation that would implement a 30% minimum tax. That legislation addresses key technical issues such as which taxes to include, what measure of income to use, and how to phase-in the tax so that there isn’t a giant spike when someone’s income rises from $999,999 to $1 million. For more information, including TPC’s estimates of the distributional impacts, please see this post by TPC’s Roberton Williams.
TPC”s Daniel Baneman has examined how the PFSA would affect marginal tax rates — i.e., the effective tax rate that would apply if a person earned an additional dollar. Here’s his chart comparing the PFSA to current policy (i.e., the taxes that would be in effect if all the expiring tax cuts get extended at the end of the year, except for the payroll tax holiday):
As you can see, the Buffett rule would have little effect on the tax rate on wages and salaries. The real action is in capital gains:
Effective marginal tax rates on capital gains would nearly double from 18 percent (under current policy) to 34 percent for taxpayers with incomes between $1 million and $2 million, and would climb to 29 percent for taxpayers with incomes over $2 million. That jump shouldn’t come as a surprise. As Warren Buffett has been telling us, high-income taxpayers who face low tax rates tend to have lots of capital gains, which are currently taxed far below the fair share tax rate of 30 percent. (If you’re wondering, taxpayers with incomes between $1 million and $2 million face a higher effective marginal rate than taxpayers with incomes over $2 million because the fair share tax phases in over that range.)
If investors ever expect that the Buffett rule will actually go into effect, expect them to realize lots of capital gains early. Update (I forgot to include the second half of that thought): After that, realizations will be significantly lower than they would be under current tax rules. That cuts into the potential revenue from the Buffett rule.
3 thoughts on “How Would the Buffett Rule Affect Marginal Tax Rates?”
The timing seems clever. Just when the baby boomers retire and begin to tap their 401ks and iras, raise the capital gains tax. Taxes should be based on income, if we are to have an income tax
Let’s tax the rich until there are no rich no more, apologies to ten years after, but I’d love to change the world.
Individuals will buy any situation that is ‘one to your customer.’
I’m not a driven businessman, but a driven artist. I never take into consideration money. Beautiful things earn money.
My grand mother is a baby boomer. I think that baby boomers have enjoyed a great deal during their prime years. :..”
My own blog site
Comments are closed.