• Home
  • About Donald
  • Contact Donald

Donald Marron

Musings on Economics, Finance, and Life

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« A Synchronized Slowdown in Developed Economies
Regulatory Uncertainty and Our Weak Economy »

More Budget Foxes, Fewer Hedgehogs

August 19, 2011 by Donald

My latest column at the Christian Science Monitor:

America’s fiscal challenges are often portrayed as a conflict between hawks and doves. The real battle, however, is between foxes and hedgehogs.

Unfortunately, fiscal hedgehogs still have the upper paw.

“The fox knows many things, but the hedgehog knows one big thing,” wrote the ancient Greek poet Archilochus. Both foxes and hedgehogs play important roles in the policy ecosystem in normal times. In times of great change, however, society needs more foxes and fewer hedgehogs. More citizens and leaders who can adapt to new conditions, and fewer who want to preserve the status quo.

That’s where we find ourselves today. Despite all the anguish over a debt limit deal, America’s fiscal outlook remains daunting. Little progress has been made on our largest budget challenges. Despite bipartisan efforts, prospects for a grand fiscal bargain remain dim.

One reason is that fiscal hedgehogs still have the upper paw on key issues.

Consider entitlements. Everyone knows that entitlement spending is our No. 1 long-term budget challenge. Because of an aging population and rising health-care costs, spending on Social Security and federal health programs will explode. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that over the next 25 years spending on these programs will rise from roughly 10 percent of the economy to almost 17 percent. Accommodating that growth would require substantial cuts in other government programs, much higher tax revenues, or unsustainable deficits and debt.

The challenge is to find ways to keep the core benefits of these programs while reining in costs. This is where entitlement hedgehogs and foxes part company.

The hedgehogs know one big thing: These programs provide major benefits. Social Security, for example, has dramatically reduced poverty among seniors and provides essential income to millions of retirees.

Inspired by that one big thing, hedgehogs oppose any benefit reductions, such as increasing the eligibility age or trimming benefits to reflect increased longevity.

Entitlement foxes have a more nuanced view. They recognize, like the hedgehogs, the value of the guaranteed retirement income that Social Security provides. But they also know that the number of retirees receiving benefits is growing faster than the number of workers paying payroll taxes. They know that Americans are living longer but retiring earlier. They know, in short, that the future will be different from the past and that the program needs to evolve to remain sustainable. Foxes are thus open to ideas like raising the eligibility age or changing the benefit formula.

A similar dichotomy exists with taxes. Revenue hedgehogs know one big thing: Taxes place a burden on taxpayers and the economy. Thus, they oppose all tax increases, even efforts to reduce the many tax breaks that complicate our tax code.

Revenue foxes see things differently. They recognize the burden that taxes place on taxpayers and the economy. But they also know that tax increases are not all created equal. Higher tax rates, for example, are usually worse for the economy than cutting back on tax breaks. Indeed, cutting tax breaks sometimes frees taxpayers to make decisions based on real economic considerations rather than taxes, thus strengthening the economy. That’s why revenue foxes support eliminating many tax breaks.

Fiscal hedgehogs will never embrace such changes. To make progress, we need more fiscal foxes.

Advertisements

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • Google
  • Reddit
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Budget, Politics | Tagged Budget, Debt, Deficit, Politics, Social Security, Taxes | 3 Comments

3 Responses

  1. on August 19, 2011 at 5:56 am foosion

    >>Because of an aging population and rising health-care costs, spending on Social Security and federal health programs will explode. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that over the next 25 years spending on these programs will rise from roughly 10 percent of the economy to almost 17 percent.>>

    It’s highly misleading to include Social Security with health programs.

    Social Security has dedicated funding, so it doesn’t hit the budget, can pay full benefits for the next 25 years and 80% thereafter. The gap is relatively small as a percentage of GDP. We could easily fill the gap with an amount equal to the cost of the Bush tax cuts on income over $250,000 or the cost of our wars or by raising the limit on income subject to Social Security taxes.

    When Social Security was revised by the Greenspan commission, they made predictions about aging, lifespan, funding, etc. The only reason their fix might fall a bit short 25 years from now is that they assumed 90% of national income would be captured under the limit on income subject to SS. Due to rising inequality, only 83% of income is subject to the cap, so funding is lower than assumed. In other words, more upper income earning is escaping SS than anticipated because upper income earners are keeping a larger share of the national pie

    It’s also highly misleading to talk about federal health programs.

    The problem is healthcare costs, not the federal programs. Healthcare costs are exploding. Federal programs are rising slower than private. The CBO found (when examining the Ryan budget) that shifting costs from the Federal govt to seniors would increase national healthcare spending.

    We have to get healthcare spending under control, not shift the burden onto seniors. It doesn’t help the average person to save $1 in taxes and spend an additional $1.10 (number for illustration) in healthcare or insurance.


  2. on August 19, 2011 at 4:50 pm jimmy Kay

    This entire argument is nonsensical in an economy predicated on fiat currency. We can simply print more than enough money to pay for any program. We could print enough “dollars”, though they are most likely only electronic credits, to pay off our national debt tomorrow.

    The entire global economy is merely a facade based on confidence and ponzi schemes. When merely swapping paper and electronic credits between corporations and proxies is considered investment, then certainly we can solve debt problems by creating more fiat debt.

    Don’t be constrained by your education, try to understand the world. When they educated you, they taught what not to think, as well as what to think. Perhaps the answers lie in the realm forbidden. Seek knowledge, don’t hide from it.


  3. on August 25, 2011 at 10:06 am Worth Reading | Above the Market

    […] Donald Marron, in The Christian Science Monitor:  “More Budget Foxes, Fewer Hedgehogs” Share this:TwitterFacebookLike this:LikeBe the first to like this post. […]



Comments are closed.

  • Most Requested

    Tax Policy Issues in Designing a Carbon Tax

    Carbon Taxes & Corporate Tax Reform

    Spending in Disguise

    How Big Is the Federal Government

  • Twitter

    Follow @dmarron
  • Get Updates by Email

    Click Here to Subscribe
  • Get Updates by RSS

    Subscribe in a reader
  • Share or Bookmark

    Bookmark and Share
  • Recent Posts

    • Three Things You Should Know about the Buyback Furor
    • Talking Money, Inflation, Fiat, & Bitcoin
    • How Should Tax Reform Treat Employee Stock and Options?
    • Eight Thoughts on Business Tax Reform
    • The 3-2-1 on Economic Growth: Hope for 3, Plan for 2, Pray it isn’t 1
    • Outside Research Organizations Can’t Replace CBO’s Budget Team
    • Can Trump Make Mexico Pay for the Wall?
    • Taxing carried interest just right
    • Britain Builds a Better Soda Tax
    • Budgeting for Federal Lending Programs Is Still a Mess
    • How Should We Use the Revenue from Taxing Carbon?
    • Happy 70th Anniversary to the Council of Economic Advisers
    • What Should We Do with the Money from Taxing “Bads”?
    • Should Governments Tax Unhealthy Foods and Drinks?
    • Should Governments Tax Products That Are Fun But Harmful?
  • 30-Second Economics

  • Tags

    Accounting Afghanistan Antitrust Arbitrage Auction Auto Banks Baucus Behavioral Economics Birds Budget Budget Process Business CBO Citigroup Climate Change Consumers Corporate Income Tax Data Debt Debt Limit Defense Deficit Economics Economy Energy Environment Europe Fannie Mae Federal Reserve Finance Freddie Mac GDP GM Google Graphics Greece GSE Health Housing Humor Incentives Income Inflation Interest Rates International Internet jobs Life Macroeconomics Measurement Medicare Microeconomics Monetary Policy Mortgage Natural Gas Nature Oil Politics Pricing Recession Regulation Search Social Security Spending Stimulus Stock Market Student Loans TARP Taxes Teaching Tragedy of the Commons Treasury unemployment Warrants
  • Categories

  • Archives

    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • January 2017
    • October 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • September 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • February 2015
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • July 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
  • Economics & Finance

    • Brad DeLong
    • Calculated Risk
    • Capital Gains and Games
    • Econbrowser
    • Economist's View
    • EconomistMom
    • Greg Mankiw
    • Infectious Greed
    • Keith Hennessey
    • Marginal Revolution
    • Modeled Behavior
    • Paul Krugman
    • Tax Policy Center
    • The Big Picture
    • The Money Illusion
  • More Fun Blogs

    • Donald and Esther’s Travels
    • Kottke
    • Olivia Judson
  • Seeking Alpha Certified

    Creative Commons License
    The content of dmarron.com carries a Creative Commons license.

    wordpress stat
  • Translate this blog into

    Albanian Arabic Bulgarian Catalan Chinese Simplified Chinese Traditional Croatian Czech Danish Dutch Estonian Filipino Finnish French Galician German Greek Hebrew Hindi Hungarian Indonesian Italian Japanese Korean Lativian Lithuanian Maltese Norwegian Polish Portuguese Romanian Russian Serbian Slovak Slovenian Spanish Swedish Thai Turkish Ukrainian Vietnamese
  • Advertisements

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


Cancel
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
%d bloggers like this: