My latest column at the Christian Science Monitor takes a crack at this perennial question. Short version: You ought to add about $4.6 trillion to whatever debt figure you are using. Why? Because the United States has about $7.3 trillion in non-debt liabilities (mostly pension and health benefits), offset by about 2.7 trillion in assets. These numbers aren’t perfect–for example, they dramatically understate the value of the gold the U.S. owns and put no value on the government’s ability to tax–but they illustrate that what the U.S. owes is more than its Treasury debt.
America is deep in debt. But how deep?
That question seems simple, yet analysts and pundits give answers that differ by trillions of dollars. Sometimes tens of trillions. That confusion arises because there are various ways to tote up America’s debts.
Many observers often focus on the publicly held debt – the bonds that the Treasury has sold into financial markets. By that measure, the federal government owed a bit more than $10 trillion at the end of last fiscal year.
That figure is important because it measures how much the federal government has had to rely on outside investors. For that reason, it does not include the special Treasury bonds in the Social Security Trust Fund and similar accounts owned by the federal government itself. From an accounting perspective, those bonds net to zero – a part of the government owes money to another part. But they are important to Social Security legally and politically. Some analysts use a measure that includes the trust funds, bringing the federal debt to more than $14 trillion.
That’s not the only measurement disagreement. Social Security and Medicare reflect a major commitment to seniors in the years ahead, but the government hasn’t identified enough dedicated financing to pay for them. Some analysts believe these unfunded amounts should be viewed as debts as well. Their size depends on technical factors like the future growth rate of health spending and how far you look into the future. Depending on their choices, analysts can get huge measures of indebtedness: $50 trillion or more.
This range of figures – $10 trillion, $14 trillion, $50 trillion – sows confusion about how indebted the United States is. Yet none of them captures all of America’s debts. The government has a host of other obligations that often get overlooked.
These other liabilities appear in the government’s little-known financial statements. Those statements use concepts familiar to anyone who has worked with a corporate balance sheet listing assets and liabilities. The government’s liabilities include more than $7 trillion in obligations that don’t appear in standard budget measures.
That’s real money, even in Washington.
The largest are commitments to federal employees, retirees, and veterans, including pensions and postretirement health benefits. Those commitments, which get surprisingly little attention, now stand at almost $6 trillion.
Another $1 trillion in liabilities includes obligations for environmental cleanup, government insurance payouts, and ongoing commitments to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Add in publicly held debt, and the government owes more than $17 trillion, before accounting for future commitments to Social Security or Medicare.
Of course, the government has assets: buildings, aircraft carriers, and a sizable portfolio of financial assets. Federal accountants tally those as worth a bit less than $3 trillion. The government’s net liabilities round out to nearly $15 trillion, 50 percent larger than the public debt alone and comparable to the value of all goods and services produced by the US economy each year.
The US is thus in debt to the tune of roughly 100 percent of gross domestic product. That’s daunting, but it need not be fatal. As the economy recovers, our obligations – both past and future – should be manageable if policymakers overcome our greatest liability: a political system that addresses short-term crises rather than long-term challenges.
Full disclosure: In an earlier life, I served on the board that establishes accounting standards for the federal government. Yes, I am that much of a budget wonk.
if one includes unfunded future liabilities, shouldnt one also include uncollected future revenues?
America has substantial assets to offset these obligations. For example, America may have to pay a lot for healthcare, but it owes the obligation to Americans and the work would be performed by Americans. The vast majority of treasury securities are owned by Americans. Environmental cleanup will be performed by Americans, making America cleaner.
That your left hand owes money to your right hand is not usually regarded as scary.
A good measure of the riskiness of debt is to look at the interest rate charged on that debt. US treasuries are trading close to record low yields. The US can borrow for 30 years at a real (after inflation) rate well under 1%. The usual rate is much higher. We can borrow for 10 years at negative real rates – borrowers pay us to take their money. We aren’t producing enough debt to satisfy market demand. A smart country would do more to meet that market demand. We could make a profit by issuing more debt.
foosion,
“The vast majority of treasury securities are owned by Americans”.
It is possible to check this by going to the Treasury Direct website for the outstanding debt held by the public and going to the “MAJOR FOREIGN HOLDERS OF TREASURY SECURITIES” report issued by the Treasury Department. The latest latter report is as of November, 2011. The outstanding public debt as of that date was about $10 trillion and the amount of that debt held by foreigners was about $4.7 trillion. Many people believe that the latter is actually higher because of the method used to arrive at those estimates.
Nevertheless, if 53 percent of this public debt is held by Americans, that is not a “vast majority”. The trend line is quite dramatic, too. If that trend continues, the amount of public debt held by Americans will soon not even be the majority.
foosion says, “That your left hand owes money to your right hand is not usually regarded as scary.” The reason it is scary is because of the financial terms in which middle classes have inadvertantly been created. Instead of participation of all in the service economies that matter (healthcare, education) we rely on the services of only the ‘best of the best’. Our debts represent mass amounts of human capital that were left out of the participation equation. Another important factor is that we tried to finance low production efficiency housing, which only the upper income can realistically afford, instead of creating affordable housing with the best of technology for middle and lower income levels.
So you are interested in applying to the US Naval Academy? Good for you! Right now you are in good company, as some estimates place the number of students expressing interest in USNA at over 50,000! Many never begin the Annapolis online application, and most never finish. What can you do to increase your application chances?
Q.How much does the United Snakes really owe?
A. A lot, a whole lot, think of all the zero’s you know, now multiply that by 10 and take the results and multiply it by the number of grains of sand on a beach, now you are beginning to get into the ballpark.
Take the output of your previous exercise, and multiply it by number of unemployed Americans, now take the output and multiply it by the number of people on food stamps.
Bingo, we have a winner. But don’t worry we’re too big to fail, that is if you are in the ruling class, otherwise you’re just collateral damage badly dressed and driving a car that’s too big, too old or too undependable.
Nothing really matters, anyone can see, nothing really matters too me. – sung by Ben Bernanke in the shower each morning as he tries to wash the printers ink from his filthy hands.
In this case, I don’t believe ignorance is bliss. Great piece, Donald. I am going to pdf it and share it with my former Managing Director, James McGinnis.
Thanks!
Regards,
Kelly
Well, in fact, America’s debt crisis has moved closer to disaster as the battle between Barack Obama and the Republicans intensified and talks appeared to have reached a stalemate. For some reason, Obama rejected a Republican proposal for a stop-gap deal, saying it would only mean them returning again next year to use the same tactics to seek more cutbacks. And of course, financial markets have reacted nervously to the debt crisis. However, economists said they still appeared to be betting that the fight was largely political posturing and likely to be resolved in future. And I really hope it will.
This is exactly why I signed up at this website: I never
find postings such as this elsewhere 🙂
Les rapports que le concepteur britannique de quatre temps de l’année avait pris sa propre vie n’ont pas été confirmées.