Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid unveiled his health bill yesterday. As everyone knows by now, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that the bill would spend $848 billion to expand coverage over the next ten years, reducing the number of uninsured in 2019 by about 31 million. (The House bill would spend $1.05 trillion over the next ten years, and would reduce the number of uninsured in 2019 by about 36 million.)
As regular readers know, CBO reports two estimates of the cost of expanding coverage: the gross cost, which reflects all new spending and tax incentives to increase insurance coverage, and the net cost, which subtracts any tax revenue increases associated with coverage policies. Leader Reid, Finance Chair Baucus, and their Senate colleagues deserve credit for emphasizing the higher figure in explaining the cost of their bill. In contrast, House leaders tried to focus attention on the lower, net cost of their bill, which led to unnecessary confusion (nb: the net coverage cost of the Senate bill is $599 billion versus $891 billion for the House bill.)
Everyone following this debate should keep in mind, however, that even the gross coverage figures do not capture all the costs of these bills. As I’ve pointed out several times (e.g., here and here), the health bills include many important provisions in addition to those expanding coverage. Many of those non-coverage provisions are intended to save money and thus pay for the coverage expansions. But some of the provisions expand spending on other health programs.
To get a fair read on the total cost of the health bills, we should therefore add together the gross cost of coverage expansions and the cost of the other provisions that increase spending (or decrease revenues). I estimate, for example, the real gross cost of the Senate health bill is $940 billion over ten years:
As noted in the table, the biggest non-coverage items are new discounts for drug purchases in the Medicare Part D program, a new fund to finance efforts in prevention and public health, and a one-year doctor “fix”. Together with other provisions, they add up to a bit more than $90 billion in additional spending, Along with about $1 billion in tax reductions, that means the bill costs $940 billion over ten years, about $92 billion more than for coverage alone. (In contrast, the House bill has a total cost that’s up near $1.3 trillion.)
Caveats: CBO does not calculate a total cost figure for the health bills. The bills include dozens of policy changes, and it would be difficult (perhaps impossible) to allocate all their impacts to specific provisions. Thus, my figures should be considered approximate. I calculated the $90 billion figure for additional spending by adding up all the individual line items in Table 4 of the cost estimate that increased direct spending, with a couple of exceptions. First, I did not include the interaction effects that CBO lists as the end of the estimate because I was not sure how to allocate them; the interactions are large and could have a material effect on my estimate, potentially up or down. Second, there was one policy that led to both spending increases and spending decreases; I included the net spending increase in my figure. I am certainly open to other suggestions about how to add up the other spending in the bill. It’s also worth noting that I have taken as given CBO’s estimate of the gross cost of expanding coverage. There are some nuances in the calculation of that figure (e.g., the treatment of payments in a reinsurance program) that I need to understand better.
There has been far more discussion of cost than of effectiveness. The fear of deficits outweighs the fear of inferior health care.
The historical fact that federal deficits not only benefit the economy, but never will be paid for by taxpayers, seems lost in the noise of misguided debt hawks.
For those who would like to see a fully paid-for universal health care, in addition to improvements in education, the infrastructure, the military, an end to poverty and continuous economic growth, you will find this site interesting: http://rodgermmitchell.wordpress.com/2009/09/07/introduction/
Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Whoever edits and pbiuslhes these articles really knows what they’re doing.
of course health insurance is very much essential for your own sake~“
health insurance should only be taken from reputable companies, you really don’t want to get it from fly-by-night companies .’:
im frequently wandering across the internet almost all of the afternoon hence I have a propensity to peruse quite a lot, which unfortunately isn’t typically a beneficial thing as a great number of the websites I visit are constructed of pointless nonsense copied from several other internet sites a zillion times, nevertheless I gotta give you props this website is genuinely readable and provides some original content, so cheers for stopping the trend of just replicating other people’s blogs and forums 🙂
I have learnt some interesting facts reading your site.
I’m pleased I found your blog on yahoo. Thanks for the sensible critique. My wife and me have been just getting ready to do some research about this. I will be very happy to see these kinds of wonderful information currently being shared freely out there.
What happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas… Unless, of course, it turns out as good as this post! Bravo! Have a great day! 🙂
A Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report on Saturday, prior to the House narrowly approved the reform bill, said the measure will insure 32 million more people in 20 The expansion of coverage would cost the government an additional $172 billion in that year, the CBO says, or about $5,375 per individual recently insured. Most of the spending is the effect of a boost in eligibility for Medicaid or of subsidies to help families comply with a fresh mandate to purchase insurance coverage if they do not have it.
Every weekend i used to pay a visit this web page, as i wish for enjoyment, for the
reason that this this web site conations in fact good funny stuff too.
I don’t even know how I ended up here, but I thought this post was good. I don’t know who you are
but certainly you are going to a famous blogger if you are
not already 😉 Cheers!
For the recruitment paper in the position of probationary officers, there is an additional second paper of essay writing.
The question paper would be designed by a faculty of professionals who would prepare a high standard question paper, allowing
entry of the best candidates. It has a large network of offices spread throughout the country where exams and
interviews are conducted for various posts in the banks.
This announcement of four examinations seems to attract great opportunities.
Candidates, who wish to apply for the bank recruitment in 2012 by IBPS for Bank PO and Clerical posts, must refer to the official website of IBPS.
Hi everyone, it’s my first pay a visit at this web site, and piece of writing is truly fruitful designed for me, keep up posting these types of articles or reviews.
This is probably the most common reason for regressing into an unhealthy
lifestyle. In spite of this the good gossip is you really don’t
have to use heavy weights or alternatively over do which for hours through to end, as a number of people simple
gentle physical activity are capable along with doing the scam.
This means that a symptom is curable by a substance that causes that symptom.
Spot on with this write-up, I actually believe this web site needs a great deal
more attention. I’ll probably be back again to read more, thanks for the info!