<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A New Price Tag for Stimulus: $862 billion, not $787 billion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dmarron.com/2010/01/27/a-new-price-tag-for-stimulus-862-billion-not-787-billion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dmarron.com/2010/01/27/a-new-price-tag-for-stimulus-862-billion-not-787-billion/</link>
	<description>Musings on Economics, Finance, and Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:36:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama's Economy Has At Last Run Out of Excuses! - Page 17 - Political Forum</title>
		<link>http://dmarron.com/2010/01/27/a-new-price-tag-for-stimulus-862-billion-not-787-billion/#comment-7877</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Obama's Economy Has At Last Run Out of Excuses! - Page 17 - Political Forum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmarron.com/?p=2532#comment-7877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] below 8%.    As usual - and the boy is slick - he directly implied his $862 billion stimulus bill  - yes, it was that much -  (wasted $$$ and unnecessary debt  ) would bring unemployment down to under 8%. But like the fraud [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] below 8%.    As usual &#8211; and the boy is slick &#8211; he directly implied his $862 billion stimulus bill  &#8211; yes, it was that much &#8211;  (wasted $$$ and unnecessary debt  ) would bring unemployment down to under 8%. But like the fraud [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1.9 Million Fewer Jobs Since 'Recession Ended Back In 2009' &#124; Sad Hill News</title>
		<link>http://dmarron.com/2010/01/27/a-new-price-tag-for-stimulus-862-billion-not-787-billion/#comment-6164</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[1.9 Million Fewer Jobs Since 'Recession Ended Back In 2009' &#124; Sad Hill News]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmarron.com/?p=2532#comment-6164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] that took out $787 billion from the pocket of American Taxpayers (subsequently discovered to cost even more) and put that money&#8230;somewhere. We are not sure where, because according to a chart now made [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that took out $787 billion from the pocket of American Taxpayers (subsequently discovered to cost even more) and put that money&#8230;somewhere. We are not sure where, because according to a chart now made [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Post Where I Break Out Some Math on Debbie Wasserman-Schultz</title>
		<link>http://dmarron.com/2010/01/27/a-new-price-tag-for-stimulus-862-billion-not-787-billion/#comment-6159</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Post Where I Break Out Some Math on Debbie Wasserman-Schultz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmarron.com/?p=2532#comment-6159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the Age of Obama began in January, 2009.2/09, The Stimulus Bill: $787 billion&#8230;whoops! I meant $862 billion. (though high-end numbers puts that total, including debt service at well over $3 trillion, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Age of Obama began in January, 2009.2/09, The Stimulus Bill: $787 billion&#8230;whoops! I meant $862 billion. (though high-end numbers puts that total, including debt service at well over $3 trillion, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama Considering Another Fiscal Stimulus &#171; InvestmentWatch</title>
		<link>http://dmarron.com/2010/01/27/a-new-price-tag-for-stimulus-862-billion-not-787-billion/#comment-6152</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Obama Considering Another Fiscal Stimulus &#171; InvestmentWatch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 23:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmarron.com/?p=2532#comment-6152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] that took out $787 billion from the pocket of American Taxpayers (subsequently discovered to cost even more) and put that money&#8230;somewhere. We are not sure where, because according to a chart now made [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that took out $787 billion from the pocket of American Taxpayers (subsequently discovered to cost even more) and put that money&#8230;somewhere. We are not sure where, because according to a chart now made [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: And Here We Go&#8230; &#187; MetalStack</title>
		<link>http://dmarron.com/2010/01/27/a-new-price-tag-for-stimulus-862-billion-not-787-billion/#comment-6151</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[And Here We Go&#8230; &#187; MetalStack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 23:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmarron.com/?p=2532#comment-6151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] that took out $787 billion from the pocket of American Taxpayers (subsequently discovered to cost even more) and put that money&#8230;somewhere. We are not sure where, because according to a chart now made [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that took out $787 billion from the pocket of American Taxpayers (subsequently discovered to cost even more) and put that money&#8230;somewhere. We are not sure where, because according to a chart now made [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QE 2 Was A Disaster: Here Is Why US Fiscal “Stimulus” Was A Complete Failure As Well &#124; infowars blog</title>
		<link>http://dmarron.com/2010/01/27/a-new-price-tag-for-stimulus-862-billion-not-787-billion/#comment-6148</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[QE 2 Was A Disaster: Here Is Why US Fiscal “Stimulus” Was A Complete Failure As Well &#124; infowars blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 14:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmarron.com/?p=2532#comment-6148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] that took out $ 787 billion from the pocket of American Taxpayers (subsequently discovered to price even more) and put that income&amp;#8230somewhere. We are not sure where, because according to a chart now [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that took out $ 787 billion from the pocket of American Taxpayers (subsequently discovered to price even more) and put that income&amp;#8230somewhere. We are not sure where, because according to a chart now [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QE 2 Was A Disaster: Here Is Why US Fiscal “Stimulus” Was A Complete Failure As Well &#124; prison planet blog</title>
		<link>http://dmarron.com/2010/01/27/a-new-price-tag-for-stimulus-862-billion-not-787-billion/#comment-6147</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[QE 2 Was A Disaster: Here Is Why US Fiscal “Stimulus” Was A Complete Failure As Well &#124; prison planet blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 14:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmarron.com/?p=2532#comment-6147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] that took out $ 787 billion from the pocket of American Taxpayers (subsequently discovered to cost even a lot more) and put that funds&amp;#8230somewhere. We are not certain where, simply because according to a chart [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that took out $ 787 billion from the pocket of American Taxpayers (subsequently discovered to cost even a lot more) and put that funds&amp;#8230somewhere. We are not certain where, simply because according to a chart [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QE 2 Was A Disaster: Here Is Why US Fiscal “Stimulus” Was A Complete Failure As Well &#124; Independent News Hub</title>
		<link>http://dmarron.com/2010/01/27/a-new-price-tag-for-stimulus-862-billion-not-787-billion/#comment-6146</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[QE 2 Was A Disaster: Here Is Why US Fiscal “Stimulus” Was A Complete Failure As Well &#124; Independent News Hub]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 13:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmarron.com/?p=2532#comment-6146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] that took out $787 billion from the pocket of American Taxpayers (subsequently discovered to cost even more) and put that money…somewhere. We are not sure where, because according to a chart now made [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that took out $787 billion from the pocket of American Taxpayers (subsequently discovered to cost even more) and put that money…somewhere. We are not sure where, because according to a chart now made [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QE 2 Was A Disaster: Here Is Why US Fiscal &#8220;Stimulus&#8221; Was A Complete Failure As Well &#171; InvestmentWatch</title>
		<link>http://dmarron.com/2010/01/27/a-new-price-tag-for-stimulus-862-billion-not-787-billion/#comment-6145</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[QE 2 Was A Disaster: Here Is Why US Fiscal &#8220;Stimulus&#8221; Was A Complete Failure As Well &#171; InvestmentWatch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 23:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmarron.com/?p=2532#comment-6145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] that took out $787 billion from the pocket of American Taxpayers (subsequently discovered to cost even more) and put that money&#8230;somewhere. We are not sure where, because according to a chart now made [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that took out $787 billion from the pocket of American Taxpayers (subsequently discovered to cost even more) and put that money&#8230;somewhere. We are not sure where, because according to a chart now made [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stimulus Bill What is it Good for? Record Debt, Bigger Government, No Recovery! &#124; The Missouri Minute</title>
		<link>http://dmarron.com/2010/01/27/a-new-price-tag-for-stimulus-862-billion-not-787-billion/#comment-3975</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stimulus Bill What is it Good for? Record Debt, Bigger Government, No Recovery! &#124; The Missouri Minute]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmarron.com/?p=2532#comment-3975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 2009 through 2019. That’s up from the original $787 billion estimate, but down from the revised, $862 billion estimate released in [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2009 through 2019. That’s up from the original $787 billion estimate, but down from the revised, $862 billion estimate released in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

