<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deficits As Far as the Eye Can See</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dmarron.com/2010/01/26/deficits-as-far-as-the-eye-can-see/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dmarron.com/2010/01/26/deficits-as-far-as-the-eye-can-see/</link>
	<description>Musings on Economics, Finance, and Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 19:06:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top Posts in 2010 &#171; Donald Marron</title>
		<link>http://dmarron.com/2010/01/26/deficits-as-far-as-the-eye-can-see/#comment-5228</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Top Posts in 2010 &#171; Donald Marron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2011 01:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmarron.com/?p=2512#comment-5228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Deficits As Far As The Eye Can See [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Deficits As Far As The Eye Can See [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Economics and Investing:Footpounds: Planet Preparedness:</title>
		<link>http://dmarron.com/2010/01/26/deficits-as-far-as-the-eye-can-see/#comment-1768</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#187; Economics and Investing:Footpounds: Planet Preparedness:]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 04:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmarron.com/?p=2512#comment-1768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Also from GG: Deficits As Far as the Eye Can See [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Also from GG: Deficits As Far as the Eye Can See [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Survival4Chicks &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Deficits As Far as the Eye Can See</title>
		<link>http://dmarron.com/2010/01/26/deficits-as-far-as-the-eye-can-see/#comment-1766</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Survival4Chicks &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Deficits As Far as the Eye Can See]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmarron.com/?p=2512#comment-1766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Read more&#8230;     Concealed handgun permit course for women only [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read more&#8230;     Concealed handgun permit course for women only [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brooks</title>
		<link>http://dmarron.com/2010/01/26/deficits-as-far-as-the-eye-can-see/#comment-1757</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brooks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 18:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmarron.com/?p=2512#comment-1757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bad news, although not unexpected. Senate rejected the Gregg-Conrad commission. Vote was in favor 53-46, but needed 60. http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-01-26/senate-rejects-conrad-plan-to-create-deficit-cutting-commission.html

Unless a decent version of such a commission is created with a mandatory up-or-down vote (or with fiscally neutral amendments) in Congress on its recommendation (if it reaches agreement on one), I think today should stand as a notable day in the history of the nation when the most gutless, most self-serving, most irresponsible politicians sacrificed the nation’s future for the sake of their own political careers, and shamelessly lied while doing it. I say they lied because those Senators are politically sophisticated enough to know that it is simply not politically feasible to get anywhere close to solving our long-term fiscal imbalance problem either solely via reductions in projected spending or solely via taxing “the rich” (or that plus cuts in Defense plus supposed savings from healthcare “reform”), but they nevertheless opposed the commission on the basis that it would lead to tax increases or that it would lead to reductions in social spending or some component thereof (Social Security and/or Medicare). Anyone who thinks either ideologically pure approach is politically feasible is either delusional, ignorant, an idiot or a liar, and those Senators are the latter. GRRRRRR!! Tough to resist profanity when writing about those ... .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bad news, although not unexpected. Senate rejected the Gregg-Conrad commission. Vote was in favor 53-46, but needed 60. <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-01-26/senate-rejects-conrad-plan-to-create-deficit-cutting-commission.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-01-26/senate-rejects-conrad-plan-to-create-deficit-cutting-commission.html</a></p>
<p>Unless a decent version of such a commission is created with a mandatory up-or-down vote (or with fiscally neutral amendments) in Congress on its recommendation (if it reaches agreement on one), I think today should stand as a notable day in the history of the nation when the most gutless, most self-serving, most irresponsible politicians sacrificed the nation’s future for the sake of their own political careers, and shamelessly lied while doing it. I say they lied because those Senators are politically sophisticated enough to know that it is simply not politically feasible to get anywhere close to solving our long-term fiscal imbalance problem either solely via reductions in projected spending or solely via taxing “the rich” (or that plus cuts in Defense plus supposed savings from healthcare “reform”), but they nevertheless opposed the commission on the basis that it would lead to tax increases or that it would lead to reductions in social spending or some component thereof (Social Security and/or Medicare). Anyone who thinks either ideologically pure approach is politically feasible is either delusional, ignorant, an idiot or a liar, and those Senators are the latter. GRRRRRR!! Tough to resist profanity when writing about those &#8230; .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

