<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Wonders of Costa Rica</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dmarron.com/2010/01/09/the-wonders-of-costa-rica/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dmarron.com/2010/01/09/the-wonders-of-costa-rica/</link>
	<description>Musings on Economics, Finance, and Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:27:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tips On How To Get Rid Of Cellulite</title>
		<link>http://dmarron.com/2010/01/09/the-wonders-of-costa-rica/#comment-7473</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tips On How To Get Rid Of Cellulite]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 00:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmarron.com/?p=2443#comment-7473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi there, I found your website by the use of Google even as searching for a related subject, your website came up, it seems to be great. I&#039;ve bookmarked to favourites&#124;added to my bookmarks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there, I found your website by the use of Google even as searching for a related subject, your website came up, it seems to be great. I&#8217;ve bookmarked to favourites|added to my bookmarks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judith</title>
		<link>http://dmarron.com/2010/01/09/the-wonders-of-costa-rica/#comment-3464</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Judith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 05:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmarron.com/?p=2443#comment-3464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think I allready have been acknowledged about this issue 
at work yesterday by a friend, but at that time 
it didn&#039;t caugh my attention.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I allready have been acknowledged about this issue<br />
at work yesterday by a friend, but at that time<br />
it didn&#8217;t caugh my attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brooks</title>
		<link>http://dmarron.com/2010/01/09/the-wonders-of-costa-rica/#comment-1663</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brooks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 18:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmarron.com/?p=2443#comment-1663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Donald,

I may be going to Costa Rica this year. It&#039;s been on my list for a while, mainly for the fauna. Awesome pics on your other blog!

Re: &lt;i&gt;another possibility: maybe one of the keys to happiness is whatever allowed Costa Rica to eliminate its military in the first place&lt;/i&gt;

Good point. Also, an important reality, apparently overlooked by Kristof (if his implication is that we would be better off, on balance, if we spend less on the military and more on other programs), is that Costa Rica is a &quot;free rider&quot; of U.S. military spending; if they didn&#039;t have a nearby superpower that would probably come to their defense if invaded by a neighbor (and thus deters an invasion), I assume it would be substantially less likely that they would have eliminated their military and saved all that money to use for other spending instead.

I have a similar question, although probably more complex and less clear (at least to me), about R&amp;D of pharmaceuticals and medical equipment: Some argue that the U.S. pays higher prices for the same stuff than do other nations, so we should start paying less (via prices government will pay and via regulatory/legal changes such as more re-importation or shorter patent protection). But if we are &quot;overpaying&quot;, does that profit potential in the U.S. market (1) increase innovation vs. what it otherwise would be? (2) enable those other nations to benefit from prices that are lower than they otherwise would be for the products in question? In other words, are those other nations free-riding on the &quot;excess&quot; spending by the U.S.?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donald,</p>
<p>I may be going to Costa Rica this year. It&#8217;s been on my list for a while, mainly for the fauna. Awesome pics on your other blog!</p>
<p>Re: <i>another possibility: maybe one of the keys to happiness is whatever allowed Costa Rica to eliminate its military in the first place</i></p>
<p>Good point. Also, an important reality, apparently overlooked by Kristof (if his implication is that we would be better off, on balance, if we spend less on the military and more on other programs), is that Costa Rica is a &#8220;free rider&#8221; of U.S. military spending; if they didn&#8217;t have a nearby superpower that would probably come to their defense if invaded by a neighbor (and thus deters an invasion), I assume it would be substantially less likely that they would have eliminated their military and saved all that money to use for other spending instead.</p>
<p>I have a similar question, although probably more complex and less clear (at least to me), about R&amp;D of pharmaceuticals and medical equipment: Some argue that the U.S. pays higher prices for the same stuff than do other nations, so we should start paying less (via prices government will pay and via regulatory/legal changes such as more re-importation or shorter patent protection). But if we are &#8220;overpaying&#8221;, does that profit potential in the U.S. market (1) increase innovation vs. what it otherwise would be? (2) enable those other nations to benefit from prices that are lower than they otherwise would be for the products in question? In other words, are those other nations free-riding on the &#8220;excess&#8221; spending by the U.S.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

