<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Doesn&#8217;t the House Bill Fail the President&#8217;s $900 Billion Test?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dmarron.com/2009/10/29/doesnt-the-house-bill-fail-the-presidents-900-billion-test/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dmarron.com/2009/10/29/doesnt-the-house-bill-fail-the-presidents-900-billion-test/</link>
	<description>Musings on Economics, Finance, and Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:36:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: What the Senate Health Bill Will Really Cost &#124; Stocks and Sectors</title>
		<link>http://dmarron.com/2009/10/29/doesnt-the-house-bill-fail-the-presidents-900-billion-test/#comment-1418</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[What the Senate Health Bill Will Really Cost &#124; Stocks and Sectors]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmarron.com/?p=2000#comment-1418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] In contrast, House leaders tried to focus attention on the lower, net cost of their bill, which led to unnecessary confusion (nb: the net coverage cost of the Senate bill is $599 billion versus $891 billion for the House [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In contrast, House leaders tried to focus attention on the lower, net cost of their bill, which led to unnecessary confusion (nb: the net coverage cost of the Senate bill is $599 billion versus $891 billion for the House [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What the Senate Health Bill Will Really Cost &#124; Reaction Radio</title>
		<link>http://dmarron.com/2009/10/29/doesnt-the-house-bill-fail-the-presidents-900-billion-test/#comment-1417</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[What the Senate Health Bill Will Really Cost &#124; Reaction Radio]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmarron.com/?p=2000#comment-1417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] In contrast, House leaders tried to focus attention on the lower, net cost of their bill, which led to unnecessary confusion (nb: the net coverage cost of the Senate bill is $599 billion versus $891 billion for the House [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In contrast, House leaders tried to focus attention on the lower, net cost of their bill, which led to unnecessary confusion (nb: the net coverage cost of the Senate bill is $599 billion versus $891 billion for the House [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What&#8217;s the Real Cost of the Senate Health Bill?</title>
		<link>http://dmarron.com/2009/10/29/doesnt-the-house-bill-fail-the-presidents-900-billion-test/#comment-1414</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[What&#8217;s the Real Cost of the Senate Health Bill?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 06:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmarron.com/?p=2000#comment-1414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] In contrast, House leaders tried to focus attention on the lower, net cost of their bill, which led to unnecessary confusion (nb: the net coverage cost of the Senate bill is $599 billion versus $891 billion for the House [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In contrast, House leaders tried to focus attention on the lower, net cost of their bill, which led to unnecessary confusion (nb: the net coverage cost of the Senate bill is $599 billion versus $891 billion for the House [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How Much Does the Senate Health Bill Cost? &#171; Donald Marron</title>
		<link>http://dmarron.com/2009/10/29/doesnt-the-house-bill-fail-the-presidents-900-billion-test/#comment-1411</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[How Much Does the Senate Health Bill Cost? &#171; Donald Marron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmarron.com/?p=2000#comment-1411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] In contrast, House leaders tried to focus attention on the lower, net cost of their bill, which led to unnecessary confusion (nb: the net coverage cost of the Senate bill is $599 billion versus $891 billion for the House [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In contrast, House leaders tried to focus attention on the lower, net cost of their bill, which led to unnecessary confusion (nb: the net coverage cost of the Senate bill is $599 billion versus $891 billion for the House [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yes, the House Health Bill Costs More than $1.2 Trillion &#124; Reaction Radio</title>
		<link>http://dmarron.com/2009/10/29/doesnt-the-house-bill-fail-the-presidents-900-billion-test/#comment-1318</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yes, the House Health Bill Costs More than $1.2 Trillion &#124; Reaction Radio]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmarron.com/?p=2000#comment-1318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] a recent series of posts, I noted that the coverage provisions in the House health bill would cost more than $1 trillion over the next ten years, notably higher than the $894 billion figure that was circulated when the bill was first released. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a recent series of posts, I noted that the coverage provisions in the House health bill would cost more than $1 trillion over the next ten years, notably higher than the $894 billion figure that was circulated when the bill was first released. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yes, the House Health Bill Costs More than $1.2 Trillion</title>
		<link>http://dmarron.com/2009/10/29/doesnt-the-house-bill-fail-the-presidents-900-billion-test/#comment-1316</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yes, the House Health Bill Costs More than $1.2 Trillion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 04:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmarron.com/?p=2000#comment-1316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] a series of posts last week, I noted that the coverage provisions in the House health bill would cost more than $1 trillion over the next ten years, notably higher than the $894 billion figure that was circulated when the bill was first released. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a series of posts last week, I noted that the coverage provisions in the House health bill would cost more than $1 trillion over the next ten years, notably higher than the $894 billion figure that was circulated when the bill was first released. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: House Healthcare Bill Costs Almost $1.3 Trillion &#124; Reaction Radio</title>
		<link>http://dmarron.com/2009/10/29/doesnt-the-house-bill-fail-the-presidents-900-billion-test/#comment-1312</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[House Healthcare Bill Costs Almost $1.3 Trillion &#124; Reaction Radio]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 08:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmarron.com/?p=2000#comment-1312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] expansions in the new House health bill would cost $894 billion over ten years, even though the actual cost is $1.055 trillion (according, as always, to the estimates of the Congressional Budget [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] expansions in the new House health bill would cost $894 billion over ten years, even though the actual cost is $1.055 trillion (according, as always, to the estimates of the Congressional Budget [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Costs of the Health Bills</title>
		<link>http://dmarron.com/2009/10/29/doesnt-the-house-bill-fail-the-presidents-900-billion-test/#comment-1307</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Costs of the Health Bills]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 11:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmarron.com/?p=2000#comment-1307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] top line in the table reflects the gross costs of the coverage expansions in each bill. As I noted yesterday, the correct figure for the House bill is $1.055 trillion. There was some confusion about this at [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] top line in the table reflects the gross costs of the coverage expansions in each bill. As I noted yesterday, the correct figure for the House bill is $1.055 trillion. There was some confusion about this at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Costs of the Health Bills: Another Look &#171; Donald Marron</title>
		<link>http://dmarron.com/2009/10/29/doesnt-the-house-bill-fail-the-presidents-900-billion-test/#comment-1306</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Costs of the Health Bills: Another Look &#171; Donald Marron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmarron.com/?p=2000#comment-1306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] top line in the table reflects the gross costs of the coverage expansions in each bill. As I noted yesterday, the correct figure for the House bill is $1.055 trillion. There was some confusion about this at [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] top line in the table reflects the gross costs of the coverage expansions in each bill. As I noted yesterday, the correct figure for the House bill is $1.055 trillion. There was some confusion about this at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The House Health Bill Costs Almost $1.3 Trillion &#171; Donald Marron</title>
		<link>http://dmarron.com/2009/10/29/doesnt-the-house-bill-fail-the-presidents-900-billion-test/#comment-1301</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The House Health Bill Costs Almost $1.3 Trillion &#171; Donald Marron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 04:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmarron.com/?p=2000#comment-1301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] expansions in the new House health bill would cost $894 billion over ten years, even though the actual cost is $1.055 trillion (according, as always, to the estimates of the Congressional Budget [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] expansions in the new House health bill would cost $894 billion over ten years, even though the actual cost is $1.055 trillion (according, as always, to the estimates of the Congressional Budget [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

