<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Much Do The Health Bills Cost?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dmarron.com/2009/10/06/how-much-do-the-health-bills-cost/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dmarron.com/2009/10/06/how-much-do-the-health-bills-cost/</link>
	<description>Musings on Economics, Finance, and Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 19:06:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Talking About the Revised Baucus Health Bill</title>
		<link>http://dmarron.com/2009/10/06/how-much-do-the-health-bills-cost/#comment-1159</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Talking About the Revised Baucus Health Bill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 03:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmarron.com/?p=1850#comment-1159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] First, as I discussed yesterday, CBO’s estimates indicate that the bill would cost a bit more than $900 billion over the next ten years, not the $829 billion that most commentators are using. The latter figure reflects the costs of expanding coverage, but does not include other efforts — e.g., paying more to physicians under Medicare and expanding the Medicare drug benefit — that are also included in the bill. The $75 billion difference strikes me as important in itself, but the larger issue may well be how much additional spending is in the House bill. The previous version of the House bill was often described as costing about $1 trillion over ten years, but if you include all the new spending in it, the actual figure was north of $1.5 trillion. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] First, as I discussed yesterday, CBO’s estimates indicate that the bill would cost a bit more than $900 billion over the next ten years, not the $829 billion that most commentators are using. The latter figure reflects the costs of expanding coverage, but does not include other efforts — e.g., paying more to physicians under Medicare and expanding the Medicare drug benefit — that are also included in the bill. The $75 billion difference strikes me as important in itself, but the larger issue may well be how much additional spending is in the House bill. The previous version of the House bill was often described as costing about $1 trillion over ten years, but if you include all the new spending in it, the actual figure was north of $1.5 trillion. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Real Cost of the New Baucus Health Bill</title>
		<link>http://dmarron.com/2009/10/06/how-much-do-the-health-bills-cost/#comment-1144</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Real Cost of the New Baucus Health Bill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmarron.com/?p=1850#comment-1144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] is that an important distinction? Because, as I noted the other day, the bill increases federal health spending in other ways. For example, it spends [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is that an important distinction? Because, as I noted the other day, the bill increases federal health spending in other ways. For example, it spends [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Real Cost of the Baucus Bill &#171; Donald Marron</title>
		<link>http://dmarron.com/2009/10/06/how-much-do-the-health-bills-cost/#comment-1137</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Real Cost of the Baucus Bill &#171; Donald Marron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 01:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmarron.com/?p=1850#comment-1137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] is that an important distinction? Because, as I noted the other day, the bill increases federal health spending in other ways. For example, it spends about $11 billion [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is that an important distinction? Because, as I noted the other day, the bill increases federal health spending in other ways. For example, it spends about $11 billion [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

