<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Netflix Avoids the Sunk Cost Fallacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dmarron.com/2009/09/28/netflix-avoids-the-sunk-cost-fallacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dmarron.com/2009/09/28/netflix-avoids-the-sunk-cost-fallacy/</link>
	<description>Musings on Economics, Finance, and Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 19:06:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Netflix (NFLX) and the Benefit of Flip Flopping — Clearing and Settlement</title>
		<link>http://dmarron.com/2009/09/28/netflix-avoids-the-sunk-cost-fallacy/#comment-7021</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Netflix (NFLX) and the Benefit of Flip Flopping — Clearing and Settlement]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 13:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmarron.com/?p=1804#comment-7021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Player–just weeks before its scheduled launch. I take that as a sign of great leadership. As I wrote two years ago: Reed Hastings is not a man who gets locked in by sunk costs: he’s willing to kill projects … [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Player–just weeks before its scheduled launch. I take that as a sign of great leadership. As I wrote two years ago: Reed Hastings is not a man who gets locked in by sunk costs: he’s willing to kill projects … [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luise Juhasz</title>
		<link>http://dmarron.com/2009/09/28/netflix-avoids-the-sunk-cost-fallacy/#comment-2593</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Luise Juhasz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 12:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmarron.com/?p=1804#comment-2593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Test &amp; Keep your iPad for Zero cost! -&gt; http://bit.ly/cFBuis]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Test &amp; Keep your iPad for Zero cost! -&gt; <a href="http://bit.ly/cFBuis" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/cFBuis</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Change me (Part 2) &#171; PEG</title>
		<link>http://dmarron.com/2009/09/28/netflix-avoids-the-sunk-cost-fallacy/#comment-1174</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Change me (Part 2) &#171; PEG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 22:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmarron.com/?p=1804#comment-1174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] In short, Reed Hastings [CEO of Netflix] is not a man who gets locked in by sunk costs: he’s willing to kill projects (or, in this&#160;case, spin them off) even if he’s got years invested in them. A good example for my students when we&#160;discusses costs in a few weeks. And just another example of the&#160;strengths of Netflix’s culture.  Netflix avoids the sunk cost fallacy, Donald Marron [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In short, Reed Hastings [CEO of Netflix] is not a man who gets locked in by sunk costs: he’s willing to kill projects (or, in this&nbsp;case, spin them off) even if he’s got years invested in them. A good example for my students when we&nbsp;discusses costs in a few weeks. And just another example of the&nbsp;strengths of Netflix’s culture.  Netflix avoids the sunk cost fallacy, Donald Marron [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald Marron</title>
		<link>http://dmarron.com/2009/09/28/netflix-avoids-the-sunk-cost-fallacy/#comment-1052</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Marron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 19:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmarron.com/?p=1804#comment-1052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes on your last point in particular. Managing a decline well strikes me as an under-appreciated talent with all the (understandable) focus on growth.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes on your last point in particular. Managing a decline well strikes me as an under-appreciated talent with all the (understandable) focus on growth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chappy</title>
		<link>http://dmarron.com/2009/09/28/netflix-avoids-the-sunk-cost-fallacy/#comment-1051</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chappy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmarron.com/?p=1804#comment-1051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, this is a good story, but, even as a devoted Netflix subscriber, I have my doubts about the companies long-term viability.  The Netflix catalog of on-demand downloads is somewhat lacking.  I have every confidence that they are trying their best to improve this catalog (and indeed it has improved), but I still think that new releases will be hard for them to come by and the big studios will make it expensive or impossible for them to ever deliver these films electronically.  Now maybe Netflix has a niche as a &#039;second best&#039; offering.  

I agree that your post shows that the Netflix management is able to understand that sunk costs are only a part of long-run profitability question, but I think what is more impressive is when managers can manage decline.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, this is a good story, but, even as a devoted Netflix subscriber, I have my doubts about the companies long-term viability.  The Netflix catalog of on-demand downloads is somewhat lacking.  I have every confidence that they are trying their best to improve this catalog (and indeed it has improved), but I still think that new releases will be hard for them to come by and the big studios will make it expensive or impossible for them to ever deliver these films electronically.  Now maybe Netflix has a niche as a &#8216;second best&#8217; offering.  </p>
<p>I agree that your post shows that the Netflix management is able to understand that sunk costs are only a part of long-run profitability question, but I think what is more impressive is when managers can manage decline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

