Comments on: We Already Did a Second Stimulus

By: A New Price Tag for Stimulus: $814 Billion

A New Price Tag for Stimulus: $814 Billion — Wed, 25 Aug 2010 15:02:31 +0000

[...] For a discussion of why the $814 billion figure (formerly known as the $862 billion figure or the $787 billion figure) is not really the right measure of stimulus, see this post. [...]

By: A New Price Tag for Stimulus: $814 Billion « Donald Marron

A New Price Tag for Stimulus: $814 Billion « Donald Marron — Wed, 25 Aug 2010 03:23:06 +0000

[...] For a discussion of why the $814 billion figure (formerly known as the $862 billion figure or the $787 billion figure) is not really the right measure of stimulus, see this post. [...]

By: A New Price Tag for Stimulus: $862 billion, not $787 billion « Donald Marron

Wed, 27 Jan 2010 04:20:51 +0000

[...] For a discussion of why the $862 billion figure (formerly known as the $787 billion figure) is not really the right measure of stimulus, see this post. [...]

By: Collapsing Tax Revenues « Donald Marron

Collapsing Tax Revenues « Donald Marron — Thu, 06 Aug 2009 02:56:20 +0000

[...] Refunds have also increased (denoted by a larger negative figure — i.e., larger cash outflows). Refunds also spiked in the middle of last year due to the first economic stimulus. [...]

By: Counting Stimulus Efforts « Donald Marron

Counting Stimulus Efforts « Donald Marron — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 11:30:52 +0000

[...] of brevity, I used dollar amounts that aren’t completely apples-to-oranges. As noted in my previous post on this topic, the $168 billion amount for the first stimulus reflects the gross amount of stimulus in the first [...]

By: Stimulus II: The Wrath Of Keynes « Around The Sphere

Stimulus II: The Wrath Of Keynes « Around The Sphere — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 00:22:18 +0000

[...] Donald Marron [...]

By: nohype

nohype — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 00:04:50 +0000

They can market it with the slogan, “The third time is the charm.”